When attacking a structural fire, from which position should firefighters always attempt to attack?

Attacking a structural fire from the uninvolved side is often the safest and most strategic approach for firefighters. This side of the structure is typically less hazardous, allowing firefighters to position themselves without immediate exposure to the flames, heat, or smoke. Starting the attack from this vantage point allows for the assessment of the situation while maintaining a degree of safety.

When positioned on the uninvolved side, firefighters can work to control the spread of the fire and protect any potential victims trapped inside without being overwhelmed by the fire conditions. This approach also can facilitate better access to areas that may need urgent attention and can help maintain an escape route if the situation deteriorates.

Attacking from the side with the most fire would likely expose firefighters to extreme danger, while starting from the downwind or nearest entry point can also lead to poor tactical positioning, potentially making it harder to control the situation or retreat if necessary. Thus, choosing the uninvolved side maximizes safety and operational effectiveness during a structural fire attack.